Reed NewsReed News

Southwest Airlines enforces extra seat policy for plus-size passengers

SocietySociety
Key Points
  • Southwest Airlines requires plus-size passengers to buy extra seats if they can't fit between armrests.
  • Refunds for extra seats are only guaranteed if flights have empty seats, and enforcement can be subjective.
  • Passengers report being denied boarding or charged extra at airports, sparking backlash as discriminatory.

Southwest Airlines changed its policy for plus-size passengers in January when it switched from open seating to assigned seating. Under the new policy, passengers who cannot fit between armrests must purchase an additional seat in advance or risk being charged at the airport. The airline's policy states that customers who encroach upon the neighboring seat(s) must purchase the number of seats needed, with the armrest considered the definitive boundary between seats. Southwest Airlines implemented an 'extra seat policy' on January 27 that requires a passenger to purchase an extra seat if the armrest cannot fully extend. Southwest Airlines began communicating changes to its policy, which is in line with industry standards, almost a year ago and continued reiterating those changes directly to customers throughout the summer.

Specific enforcement details include advance booking requirements and refund limitations. Refunds for a second seat are only guaranteed if the flight departs with at least one empty seat. Passengers who do not book an extra seat in advance can be required to buy another ticket on the spot at an agent's discretion. The airline has not disclosed what specific guidelines or measurements agents use to determine if a passenger needs an extra seat, leaving enforcement potentially subjective.

You just made this arbitrary look at my body.

Kari McCaw, Passenger

Passenger experiences highlight enforcement issues at airports. Passenger Kari McCaw was stopped at the airport while heading to a conference in Las Vegas and told she had to buy a second seat or wouldn't be able to fly. According to Daily Mail - Home, Kari McCaw described the encounter as an arbitrary judgment of her body, adding that she typically fits in seats fine despite using a seatbelt extender. Passenger Ruby Cosby was banned from boarding her flight at Nashville International Airport on February 28 after a check-in attendant claimed she was too large to fit in a seat, leaving her the only option of purchasing a second seat for an extra $450. Ruby Cosby was told she would need more than one seat for her trip to Los Angeles, California. She had booked a round-trip flight, meaning she would have to pay for another seat on her return trip, doubling her total to $900. Ruby Cosby made it to Los Angeles by booking one $350 ticket through Delta Air Lines. According to Daily Mail - News, Ruby Cosby described being told she couldn't board or get a refund, questioning her options. She also expressed worry that the policy lacks guidelines to prevent discrimination, relying on perception.

Public backlash and criticism of the policy as discriminatory have emerged. Some travelers accuse the airline on social media of judging passengers based on appearance. The policy change has sparked backlash, with some calling it a 'fat tax'. On social media, Ruby Cosby said she was being judged by appearance without being allowed to try the seat first. Samrya, a TikTok creator, stated on social media that the airline does not care about plus-sized travelers.

I don't have any hips, so I sit in seats just fine all the time. I'm all front and back, so I do use a seatbelt extender, but if you took my hip circumference, I fit in the normal airplane, 16, 17 inch seat or whatever, just fine.

Kari McCaw, Passenger

Key unknowns about enforcement guidelines and policy impact remain. It is unclear how many passengers have been affected by the new policy and required to purchase extra seats. Southwest Airlines has not confirmed whether it has received formal complaints or is investigating allegations of discriminatory enforcement. The airline has also not detailed what steps it is taking to address passenger concerns about subjective enforcement and potential discrimination. Comparisons to other airlines with similar policies, such as Alaska Airlines, are limited as enforcement and refund guarantees vary across the industry.

So you're just looking at me and telling me I can't fit in the seat.

Ruby Cosby, Passenger

You're not gonna let me go get in the seat first before you assume I can't fit in the seat.

Ruby Cosby, Passenger

Sir, so you're telling me I can't get on the flight, I can't get a refund. I'm like 'What are my options?'

Ruby Cosby, Passenger

I understand having a policy put into place to make sure others are comfortable; my main worry is that there's nothing put into place to stop discrimination or anything from happening. It's just based on perception, that's my worry. I feel like this policy can be used unfairly because there are no guidelines.

Ruby Cosby, Passenger
Tags
Location
Corroborated
Daily Mail - HomeDaily Express - TravelThe Independent - MainDaily Mirror - Main
4 publications · 8 sources
View transparency reportReport inaccuracy