The disruption of oil flow in the Strait of Hormuz, combined with Iran's retaliatory moves following attacks by the US and Israel, has placed immense pressure on global energy markets. Ship traffic through the strait dropped to almost zero from a typical 138 ships per day, according to the World Trade Organization. This paralysis of a waterway that carries approximately 20% of daily global oil demand has triggered deep fears about the stability of the global supply chain. The military offensive launched by the United States and Israel against Iran is reverberating powerfully in the energy sphere, with strong effects on the future configuration of the market. Iranian attacks on refineries in Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Qatar have directly affected supply, exacerbating the disruption caused by the maritime standstill.
Immediate surges in oil and gas prices have intensified inflation concerns worldwide. Brent oil prices, which had hovered in the $70 to $80 range before the conflict, saw levels spike above $115. Iran's targeting of a liquefied natural gas export facility in Qatar, after Israel attacked Iran's South Pars Gas Field, caused already high prices to rise further. Analysts point out that developments in the Middle East could affect inflation through three major channels: a direct impact on consumer price indices from energy price increases, a rise in core inflation as companies pass on higher costs, and increased permanence of price increases due to shifting inflation expectations and wage demands. The crisis also led to sudden increases of 25% to 35% in urea and nitrogen-based fertilizer prices. Measures such as International Energy Agency member countries releasing 400 million barrels of strategic oil reserves, the US providing a temporary exemption to sanctions on Russian oil stranded at sea, and suspending certain maritime laws failed to prevent oil prices from rising.
Major financial institutions have issued assessments of the geopolitical risks and price forecasts. UBS warned that escalating tensions between the US and Iran could heighten global geopolitical risks. The bank does not expect the recent escalation to last long, anticipating only short-term disruptions to global energy supplies. UBS expects the initial rise in oil prices to retreat at least partially once military operations near an end, and noted that global markets may experience volatility in coming weeks before investors refocus on economic indicators. UBS added that an escalation into broader military action was not unexpected, as it had previously predicted the US could launch a strike on Iran. United Overseas Bank expects oil prices to stabilize at $80 per barrel during the second and third quarters of 2026, despite the escalating conflict. UOB said it is still premature to expect oil prices to reach $100 per barrel unless regional escalation intensifies further, but noted that any attacks on Gulf energy facilities or oil tankers could push prices above $80. The bank forecasts that oil prices will resume a downward trend through the first quarter of 2027, averaging around $70, and noted that OPEC still holds spare production capacity, with room for Saudi Arabia to raise output to curb sharp price surges. UOB also raised its gold price forecasts to $5,400 per ounce in Q2 2026, $5,600 in Q3 2026, $5,800 in Q4 2026, and $6,000 per ounce in Q1 2027, citing the Iran crisis reinforcing gold's safe-haven role.
Analysis from Capital Economics highlights vulnerabilities and alternative routes for energy exports. The firm noted that Gulf oil exports have alternative routes bypassing the Strait of Hormuz, such as Saudi Arabia's pipeline to Yanbu with a capacity of 5 million barrels per day and the UAE's pipeline with a capacity of 1.8 million. However, Capital Economics stated that Iraq, Kuwait, and Iran lack significant alternative oil routes, meaning around 10–20% of global oil supplies could be at risk in a disruption. The firm also explained that liquefied natural gas exports have no alternative routes, which is why European gas prices surged about 23% compared to an 8% increase in Brent crude. The Strait of Hormuz accounts for roughly 25% of globally seaborne oil shipments, including around 14 million barrels per day of crude oil, and about 20% of global LNG flows.
Central banks and international bodies are warning of inflationary consequences. The WTO's Global Trade Outlook and Statistics report stated that central banks could pause interest rate cuts or raise rates to prevent deterioration in inflation expectations if oil and natural gas prices rose significantly and permanently. The U.S. Federal Reserve, European Central Bank, and Bank of England are holding meetings to assess the inflationary impact of higher oil prices.
The energy shock is driving renewed calls to speed up renewable energy deployments to insulate countries from such disruptions. International Renewable Energy Agency data shows over 90% of new renewable installations built during 2024 cost less than coal or gas alternatives. Nations with substantial solar and wind capacity weather supply disruptions better since these resources come from domestic conditions rather than vulnerable waterways. Countries that built renewable capacity are proving the approach works, with Pakistani solar installations eliminating over $12 billion in fossil fuel imports.
Regional impacts vary significantly across Asia-Pacific and Europe. For Asia-Pacific countries, the conflict confronts them with higher prices and disruptions forcing a reconsideration of energy security issues. Chinese vehicle electrification rates approach 10%, per International Energy Agency tracking, even while the country buys more crude petroleum than any nation. India pursued cleaner energy with less intensity, leaving it more vulnerable to disruptions, emphasizing securing cheap Russian petroleum and expanding coal extraction alongside solar and wind buildouts. The European Union still shows vulnerability in energy matters, having embarked on a strategy of diversification since the invasion of Ukraine. European responses to the energy crisis highlight missed opportunities to prioritize renewables, with some capitals shifting toward securing alternative suppliers, such as Germany fast-tracking LNG terminal construction for American shipments. In Sri Lanka, authorities urged electric vehicle owners to stop charging at night due to a surge in demand forcing the country to burn more coal and diesel.
Market reactions have included export shifts and price volatility. Iraq resumed limited oil exports through the Turkish port of Ceyhan, using a pipeline that avoids the Strait of Hormuz, sending an initial 250,000 barrels a day from Kirkuk fields. Iraq normally ships 3.5 million barrels a day from its Basra fields via the Strait of Hormuz. Oil prices fell following Iraq's announcement, with West Texas Intermediate down about 1.5% at $94.7 a barrel in volatile trading. South Korea said it would receive an additional 18 million barrels of oil from the UAE through alternative supply channels bypassing the Strait of Hormuz. About 70% of South Korea's oil imports normally pass through the Strait of Hormuz.
Industrial and supply chain disruptions are spreading beyond energy. The Middle East war is forcing petrochemical giants in key Asian economies to cut production due to rattled supplies of naphtha. Mitsubishi Chemical and Mitsui Chemicals have cut output, Shin-Etsu Chemical said it would raise prices, and LG Chem warned it may not fulfil some orders. The International Maritime Organization will begin an extraordinary session to discuss shipping amid the war, with possible non-binding resolutions such as establishing a safe maritime corridor in the Persian Gulf.
The financial sector is experiencing fallout from extreme market volatility. Hedge fund Caxton Associates sustained a loss of at least $600 million this month, with its $9 billion Macro fund declining 7% in a single week. These losses are attributed to market volatility sparked by the war in the Middle East. Tudor Investment Corporation faced a 1.8% loss during the same period. Caxton's Macro fund is down approximately 1% for the year, while Tudor's fund is up 0.9% year-to-date.
Some oil and gas exporters could benefit economically from the conflict. Argentina's Southern Energy signed an LNG supply contract with German company SEFE. The increase in oil prices could mean between $1.3 and $1.7 billion in additional annual revenue for Argentina's Milei administration. Transportadora de Gas del Sur presented a project with a three-billion-dollar investment, expected to generate annual revenues exceeding $1.2 billion.
The broader geopolitical and energy market implications are profound. The dispute underscores the deep dependence entailed by fossil fuels, linking energy supply directly to geopolitics. Supply based on clean sources does not create such dependence, as no country controls the sun or wind, expanding sovereign decision-making. If the conflict persists, the rise in fuel prices could become even more pronounced, triggering a new wave of global inflation.
Key unknowns remain regarding the duration and full impact of the crisis. The current status of military operations between the US, Israel, and Iran is unclear, including whether there are ongoing attacks or moves toward ceasefires. It is also uncertain how long the disruption in the Strait of Hormuz will last and what specific measures are being taken to restore normal maritime traffic. The exact impacts on global inflation and GDP growth are difficult to gauge given conflicting oil price reports and varied economic forecasts.
Further unknowns involve the effectiveness of mitigation efforts. The extent to which alternative energy routes and accelerated renewable deployments have mitigated the crisis in different regions has not been fully quantified. The specific losses and adaptive strategies of hedge funds and other financial institutions affected by the market volatility also remain unclear.
The Financial Times offers a trial of unlimited access for €1 for 4 weeks. After the trial, the subscription costs €69 per month for complete digital access to quality FT journalism on any device. Cancellation is allowed anytime during the trial, and users can check whether they already have access via their university or organisation. Terms & Conditions apply to the subscription. The Financial Times offers plans for individuals, with users able to discover all plans currently available in their country, and also offers digital access for multiple readers in organisations, including exclusive features and content.