Victoria Police are investigating historical sexual assault allegations made by actress Ruby Rose against singer Katy Perry, with the inquiry focusing on an incident alleged to have occurred in 2010 at a nightclub in Melbourne's central business district. Ruby Rose, who was in her twenties at the time, has accused Perry of sexual assault, though specific details of the alleged event remain unclear. The investigation is being handled by the Melbourne Sexual Offences and Child Abuse Investigation Team, reflecting the seriousness with which authorities are treating the claims. This development follows Rose's decision to formally report the allegations, marking a significant escalation from initial social media comments. The case has drawn widespread attention due to the high-profile nature of both individuals involved, potentially impacting their public reputations and careers.
Katy Perry has denied the allegations through her representative, who issued a statement labeling them as false and dangerous. According to the representative, the claims are not only categorically false but also reckless lies that could cause harm. Ruby Rose filed a police report on April 13, 2026, according to major media reports, though the exact contents of that report have not been disclosed. This filing prompted the Victoria Police investigation, which is now underway, though its progress and timeline remain uncertain. The denial from Perry's camp sets the stage for a legal and public relations battle, with both sides preparing to defend their positions as the inquiry proceeds.
Last update on this: As of this afternoon, I have finalized all of my reports.
The allegations first surfaced on social media, where Ruby Rose made her claims in an Instagram comment responding to Katy Perry's comment about Justin Bieber's Coachella set, according to major media reports. In that comment, Rose accused Perry of assault at a Melbourne nightclub, stating it had taken her years to speak publicly about it. This social media origin has amplified the controversy, spreading the claims rapidly across platforms and drawing scrutiny from fans and media alike. The use of Instagram as a platform for such serious accusations highlights the evolving role of social media in public disputes and legal matters.
Ruby Rose has stated she can no longer publicly discuss the case due to the ongoing police investigation, explaining in a social media post that she has finalized her reports and is complying with police requests. She expressed relief and a desire to move forward, emphasizing the legal constraints now in place. This silence is likely to persist until the investigation concludes, limiting public commentary from Rose and potentially affecting the flow of information. Her decision to comply with police requests underscores the formal nature of the proceedings and her commitment to the legal process.
This means I am no longer able to comment, repost, or talk publicly about any of those cases, or the individuals involved.
Katy Perry's representative has questioned Ruby Rose's credibility, stating that Rose has a history of making serious public allegations on social media against various individuals, claims that have repeatedly been denied by those named. This assertion aims to cast doubt on Rose's allegations by pointing to past behavior, though it does not address the specific claims about the 2010 incident. The representative's statement also described the allegations as dangerous reckless lies, reinforcing Perry's denial and attempting to discredit Rose publicly. This tactic is common in high-profile disputes, where character attacks can influence public opinion and legal outcomes. However, the effectiveness of such strategies will depend on the evidence presented in the police investigation and any subsequent legal actions.
Historical tension between Ruby Rose and Katy Perry includes past social media comments, with Rose describing Perry's track 'Swish Swish' as 'purposeful poop' in 2017, according to research. Days later, Rose backtracked on her 2017 comments, writing on X that being mean doesn't suit her. This pattern of public criticism followed by retraction suggests a complicated relationship between the two celebrities, potentially fueling the current allegations. The 'complicated backstory' mentioned by sources adds context to the dispute, though its exact nature remains unknown, including whether past conflicts relate directly to the assault claims. Understanding this history is crucial for assessing the motivations and credibility of both parties, as it may influence how the allegations are perceived by investigators and the public.
This is a standard request from the police and in many ways, quite the relief. I can start the healing process now. And temporary [sic] move forward. I love you all so much.
Specific evidence or details Ruby Rose provided to Victoria Police in her report are unknown, as authorities have not released information about the contents of the filing. The exact nature and circumstances of the alleged assault at the nightclub in 2010 also remain unclear, including what precisely occurred and where within the Spice Market Nightclub it took place. Whether there were any witnesses to the alleged incident or if any evidence beyond Rose's account exists is another key unknown that could impact the investigation's outcome. These gaps in information highlight the challenges faced by police in historical assault cases, where evidence may be scarce or difficult to verify. As the inquiry progresses, more details may emerge, but for now, the public and media are left with limited facts.
The timeline and progress of the Victoria Police investigation into the allegations are uncertain, with no official updates on how long it might take or what stages it has reached. The nature of the 'complicated backstory' between Ruby Rose and Katy Perry mentioned by a source is also unknown, leaving questions about whether past interactions could shed light on the current claims. These unknowns complicate efforts to understand the full context of the allegations and predict potential outcomes, such as charges or settlements. Investigators will need to navigate these uncertainties while gathering evidence and interviewing relevant parties, a process that could take weeks or months. Until more information is released, speculation may continue, but the legal process will ultimately determine the facts.
Katy Perry assaulted me at spice market nightclub in Melbourne. Who gives a s**t what she thinks.
In summary, the investigation by Victoria Police into Ruby Rose's allegations against Katy Perry represents a significant development in a long-simmering dispute, with both sides presenting conflicting narratives. The case underscores the complexities of historical assault claims, especially when involving celebrities and social media, and highlights the importance of thorough police work. As the inquiry continues, key unknowns about evidence, circumstances, and progress will need to be addressed to reach a resolution. The outcome could have lasting implications for both individuals' careers and for public discourse on sexual assault allegations in the entertainment industry. For now, all parties await further developments, with Rose maintaining silence and Perry denying the claims through her representative.
She added that it had taken her 'almost two decades' to speak about it publicly.
She described the singer's track Swish Swish as 'purposeful poop' in 2017.
Being mean doesn't suit me and leaves me feeling dirty.