Major media reports indicate that the man deliberately set fire to his apartment with the aim of obtaining benefits, though the specific type of benefits he sought has not been disclosed. Following the fire, he was convicted, but details about the sentence or punishment, as well as the exact timing and location of the incident, remain unclear. According to major media reports, the conviction resulted in the forced sale of his apartment, highlighting the severe repercussions of his actions.
The man's broader motive beyond receiving benefits has not been confirmed, leaving questions about what drove him to commit arson. This case underscores the legal risks associated with fraudulent claims for financial gain.