Reed NewsReed News

Great Pyramid's origins debated amid alternative theories

Science & technologyScience
Key Points
  • Alternative theories challenge the Great Pyramid's traditional role as a tomb, proposing it may have been an energy-generating system.
  • The Orion Correlation Theory suggests the pyramids are much older than the accepted 2600 BC date, based on stellar alignments.
  • Mainstream Egyptologists uphold the pyramid was built for Pharaoh Khufu using local limestone, despite no mummy being found inside.

Alternative theories suggest the Great Pyramid may not have been constructed during Khufu's reign and could have served as an energy-generating system. According to Daily Mail - Home, AJ Gentile described residues found within key chambers matching substances known to produce powerful chemical reactions, such as zinc chloride, hydrochloric acid, and sulfuric acid. The combination of these residues could have triggered reactions inside the pyramid. The layout of internal chambers appears designed to allow substances to move downward through shafts using gravity, triggering chemical reactions, and hydrogen, a highly reactive gas, can expand rapidly to create pressure waves, with materials inside potentially enhancing these effects. However, the definitive evidence for these chemical residues remains unclear, and how mainstream Egyptologists specifically refute these energy-generating theories is not detailed.

The Orion Correlation Theory, which gained traction in the 1990s, proposes that the three pyramids at Giza were deliberately aligned to match the three stars of Orion's Belt, associated with the god Osiris. Supporters argue this alignment reflects the sky as it appeared around 10,500 BC, suggesting the pyramids may be far older than the accepted date of about 2600 BC. Many Egyptologists dispute this theory, saying archaeological evidence firmly dates the structures to Egypt's Fourth Dynasty, and the current scientific consensus on the Orion Correlation Theory is not specified.

There is evidence of zinc chloride on one side and hydrochloric acid on another side and sulfuric acid.

AJ Gentile, Host of The Why Files

Mainstream Egyptologists maintain that the Great Pyramid was constructed by ancient workers using limestone blocks quarried nearby as the burial site of Pharaoh Khufu 4,500 years ago. According to Daily Mail - Home, AJ Gentile described the lack of mummies in pyramids, questioning the tomb theory, but Egyptologists often attribute this to robbery. Recent archaeological findings that support or challenge the traditional timeline are not mentioned in the claims.

It's supposed to be the tomb for Khufu, but no mummy's ever been found in a pyramid. They've never found any of that. Egyptologists will say, 'Well, they were robbed, the mummies were there, but they were taken out.' All right. Well, there's no evidence of any of that.

AJ Gentile, Host of The Why Files

They're built in a way so they come down, you use gravity and just pour these chemicals down, [and it] creates this hydrogen reaction.

AJ Gentile, Host of The Why Files
Sourced
Daily Mail - HomeDaily Mail - Science & Tech
2 publications
View transparency reportReport inaccuracy
Great Pyramid's origins debated amid alternative theories | Reed News